Sometimes i am thinking of the designers sometimes must act like doctors especially while they are advertising about a food or its a matter of welfare, they have to be aware of that product that it's healthy etc.
In the old days some of the advertisement agencies were fooling people a lot but, nowadays there are rules about what you are advertising and when public is fooled and people start to complain about a product ASA will be in charge with the advertisement and they have a power to remove that advertisement.
Well i think its not just about the designers that fools the innocent people but also about the product owners.
We are living in a cruel world that rich are getting more rich poor is getting more poor. In this case designers must not be a part of this game.
There is a list about the general rules about adveristement from ASA.
* 3 : Substantiation
* 4 : Legality
* 5 : Decency
* 6 : Honesty
* 7 : Truthfulness
* 8 : Matters of opinion
* 9 : Fear and distress
* 10 : Safety
* 11 : Violence and anti-social behaviour
* 12 : Political advertising
* 13 : Protection of privacy
* 14 : Testimonials and endorsements
* 15 : Prices
* 16 : Availability of products
* 17 : Guarantees
* 18 : Comparisons with identified competitors and/or their products
* 19 : Other comparisons
* 20 : Denigration and unfair advantage
* 21 : Imitation
* 22 : Recognising marketing communications and identifying marketers
* 23 : Advertisement features
* 24 : Free offers
There are more rules that deisgner has to consider about.
In my opinion as a human we should have to ask ourselves about what we are doing, is it fair or not, are we fooling people or are we attract public with our design skills.
Here are some examples for good advertisement:

This indicates that the only thing to stop this car is red light.

Playing around with the BMW (BWM) its a good idea to tell people not to use third party products on the BMW cars, so that it looks weird.
Below advertisements are from Turkey Istanbul TBWA which i like.
BMW advertisements are making a relationship between the wild life and human life. BMW cars are rear-wheel drive as animals. So the company makes a relationship. Why try to change the nature, nature has its own perfect design.




This advertisement that horse is respecting the horse power of the car.

Vacuum cleaner that is very quite there is no musical note after treble clef. we had that vacuum cleaner so when i compare with the other one its really quite than the other one with the same power.
There also bad or false advertisement that we faced with.
Like alcoholic products, tobacco advertisement, well actually nowadays there are barriers for those kind of products. Well in Turkey even its prohibited to put logos of tobacco company on streets also the places where they sell tobacco products.
Here how the ASA works for the complaints, click the link below to read,
http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/Public/TF_ADJ_44006.htm
And Here is a Link For Rejected Banned and complaint advertisements that all over the world,
Another Advertisement which is rejected


Adjudication of the Advertising Standards Authority:
Complaint:
Objections to an ad, in The Sunday Times Style Magazine, for a clothing company. The ad showed a naked man from the rear with three pairs of women's legs straddling his body. The complainants objected that the position of the women's legs around the man's body overtly suggested sexual behaviour and was therefore offensive. They were also concerned that the image was unsuitable in a magazine that might be seen by children. One complainant, who believed the man in the ad was black, objected that the ad was racist.
Adjudication:
Complaints upheld
Diesel (UK) Ltd said the ad was no longer in use and that it was last used in The Sunday Times Style Magazine. They maintained that Style Magazine was a leading voice of fashion with an adult readership who would be challenged by the ad and were likely to understand the irony and fun it presented. They said the overall aim of the ad was to show how Diesel challenged the everyday view of life. The Sunday Times Style Magazine said the ad was well designed and photographed within a contemporary fashion environment. They added that because it had already been run in other publications, they considered it to be acceptable.
The ASA noted Diesel's assurance that the ad was no longer appearing. We also noted the surreal and stylized nature of the image but considered the nudity and the position of the women in relation to the man's body was a clear allusion to sexual behaviour and unsuitable for a newspaper supplement with a broad readership. We considered, however, that the use of a male model with dark skin was intended to create contrast with the light skin of the women's legs and was unlikely to be seen as racist. We concluded that the sexual image was likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was unsuitable in a magazine that could be seen by children.
This is another tobacco advertisement, and its even more than a tobacco so that finned NIS 400.000

